For this church:
It is highly probable that the church is built on the site of one of those mentioned in Domesday, however, there is no surviving, visible evidence of either of these early churches.
The earliest parts (Early English, around 1275) are the piers, arches and wall of the north side of the nave. The chancel and east ends of the aisles are 14th century Decorated style and are of superior craftsmanship.
Graffiti can be seen in the chancel: on the Easter Sepulchre above the four soldiers; on the walls close to the south east window; on the pillar at the end of the north side choir stalls and behind the centre seat of the sedilia. A number of masons’ marks can be seen in the chancel particularly on the window sills and the back wall of the sedilia.
The Perpendicular parts, built in the late 15th century, are the tower, the clerestory and the nave windows (except those to the east), the additional height to the walls of the aisles, the roofs of the nave and aisles, the chancel screen, a niche at the east end of the south aisle and the font.
The Perpendicular tower of five stages was built by Sir Thomas Molyneux in about 1482. Its eight pinnacles with their fantastic gargoyles sit above ogee bell-openings. Shields, some with heraldic designs, can be seen just below the top of the tower. The church is not quite symmetrical and it appears there may have been problems fitting the tower to the west end as the tower itself stands clear of the nave. The north aisle is about 3m wider and higher than the south aisle and the lines above the chancel arch seem to belong to an earlier steeply pitched roof.
The porch was built in 1887, replacing an earlier one. There is an empty niche above the door and around the door graffiti can be seen.
A punning shield of Sir Thomas Molyneux can be seen in the west doorway – a cross Moline (ends of arms divided and splayed outwards) and the original door has carvings which may be signs of the zodiac and remains of an inscription, believed to read: ‘Jesu Mercy Lady Helpe’ across the middle. The arms of the Markhams of Cotham may also be seen. On either side of the door are heads and coats of arms. It’s not easy to identify the details of the coats of arms apart from the Molyneux cross, but one appears to depict a horse and another has a dog’s head.
A piece of musket shot was found in the door, may be a relic of the Civil War.
There are scratch dials on the south side of the tower and the nave buttresses. These would give the time of the Mass and the Divine Offices.
There are carvings on the window stops at the eastern end of the south aisle, one of which is a bearded man.
The priest’s door, with shafts and moulding, has hood moulds with carvings of regal heads. Carvings of heads continue on the south side and round to the east window – these include a man pulling a face and a woman who appears to have toothache. Some of the carvings of men appear to be wearing what may be masons’ caps.
The east window itself is a fine, seven light curvilinear window with ornate decorated tracery.
The east gable cross no longer exists but the saddle stone on which it sat may still be seen.
On the north side of the chancel the blocked door and squint may be seen as can the place where a small cupboard had been. There is a statue plinth and two corbels that would have supported the roof of the former chapel to the north.
Along the length of the north wall dressed stone reaches the height of the windows.
The north nave door is identical to the south chancel door except for its statue niche.
Timbers and roofs
The timber frame is mainly Elphick 'V' form (Pickford 6.B) with modifications to some trusses to create Elphick 'W' form (Pickford 6.D) trusses; the whole is likely to be of 17th century date. The frame was apparently originally constructed with three bays with a fourth added on the south side at a later date which has straight Elphick 'X' form (Pickford 6.I) trusses.
Scheduled for preservation Grade 3.
Excavations and potential for survival of below-ground archaeology
There have been no known recent archaeological excavations within the church or churchyard.
The 1779-80, 1843-4, and 1880-7 restorations of the church have undoubtedly impacted upon the archaeology in both the standing fabric and below ground. The tower was entirely rebuilt in about 1482, destroying any traces of a predecessor and evidently disrupting the fabric and stratigraphy of the west end. However, the standing fabric contains much medieval material of the C13th-C15th and the core walls of the building are all likely to be substantially medieval; the tower is probably entirely of c.1482 with some later restoration to interior fixtures. The extent to which interior stratigraphy has been disturbed post-1482 is unknown.
The surrounding, triangular, churchyard appears to be intact. There are many grave-markers of various dates, especially on the south side. The earliest visible are of the 18th century.
The overall potential for the survival of below-ground archaeology in the churchyard, is considered to be VERY HIGH, and evidence of the construction of the west tower in the late 15th century is expected to survive. Below the present interior floors of the nave and chancel it is considered to be HIGH-VERY HIGH; below the late medieval tower, where there is a possibility of redeposited, earlier material, VERY HIGH. The standing fabric of the church has been disturbed in the various restorations although medieval work is evident thoughout and the core walls of both nave and chancel probably remain intact from the late 13th century to the late 15th century. The tower was entirely rebuilt in c1482. The overall potential for surviving medieval archaeology in the standing fabric of the church is considered to be VERY HIGH.
Exterior:Burial numbers expected to be average and relatively undisturbed. There is a possibility of other archaeology of the medieval period due to the diminutive, clustered nature of the settlement.
Interior:Floors probably disturbed in three restorations from 1779 to 1887. Stratigraphy under the nave and chancel is likely to be complex mixture of 13th-15th century layers with unknown survival of possible earlier deposits beneath. The tower is likely to have mainly late 15th century construction deposits, perhaps containing earlier, redeposited material. All will likely be punctuated by late medieval graves and post-medieval burials.